TIMBER BRIEFING: U.S. LUMBER PRICES COULD BE AFFECTED BY SANCTIONS ON RUSSIA

~ ELUL ~ Leave a comment

By: Danny C. Kelly-Stallings, Marisa N. Bocci, Christopher J. Voss, Michael E. Ruck

*This article was originally published as a K&L Gates Client Alert and is being republished with the permission of K&L Gates.

The U.S. lumber market has seen unprecedented price rises in recent years. Prices could climb even higher as the world responds to the conflict between Russia and Ukraine. Russia is a major exporter of wood in the global market, particularly in China and the European Union. If these countries restrict wood products imports from Russia, or if Russia refuses to export to them, the strain on global supply could drive domestic prices to new heights as Russia-dependent markets look for new sources of wood. 

Continue reading “TIMBER BRIEFING: U.S. LUMBER PRICES COULD BE AFFECTED BY SANCTIONS ON RUSSIA” →

A Dollar for Your Thoughts? Potential Outcomes of Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski for Climate Litigants

~ ELUL ~ Leave a comment

David Wang*

In what could prove to be a boon for climate litigants, the U.S. Supreme Court decided earlier this year that nominal damages can sufficiently satisfy the “redressability” prong of Article III standing. In Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski, the Supreme Court considered whether Chike Uzuegbunam, a student at Georgia Gwinnett College, could still allege First Amendment violations against college officials even after the officials abandoned the speech restrictions at issue.[1] The Supreme Court decided in March that Mr. Uzuegbunam still had standing to make the claim if he claimed nominal damages—a trivial monetary award for a plaintiff whose legal right was technically violated but is otherwise not entitled to compensation because of no accompanying loss or harm. As a result, Uzuegbunam may have opened up an avenue for many litigants (including climate litigants) to overcome the ever-present thorns of Article III standing requirements.

Continue reading “A Dollar for Your Thoughts? Potential Outcomes of Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski for Climate Litigants” →

Clarifying the Scope of Transportation Facility Stormwater Regulation in Washington

~ ELUL ~ Leave a comment

*Erika Spanton

The United States District Court for the Western District of Washington and Washington Pollution Control Hearings Board recently ruled that in the context of transportation facilities, the scope of Washington’s former 2015 and current 2020 Industrial Stormwater General Permit (ISGP) are limited to only the portions of the facility involved in specified auxiliary operations, not the entire transportation facility. 

Continue reading “Clarifying the Scope of Transportation Facility Stormwater Regulation in Washington” →

Bridging the GAP Between Environmental Assessments and Carbon Reduction Mandates

~ ELUL ~ Leave a comment

Molly Barker and Ankur Tohan*

Carbon regulation in Washington is about to get more complicated. In March 2021, the Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE) issued a conceptual framework[1] and draft rulemaking language[2] for public comment on Greenhouse Gas Assessments for Projects (the “GAP Rule”).[3] The release of the GAP Rule may—as a result of providing the first framework of its kind in the state for evaluating carbon footprints on major industrial projects—lay the groundwork for more enforceable carbon regulations. The GAP Rule may also increase competition on low carbon project design or may prompt the allocation of more corporate dollars toward mandated mitigation measures.

Continue reading “Bridging the GAP Between Environmental Assessments and Carbon Reduction Mandates” →

Cleaning Up the Cleanup Rule – Previewing Possible Changes to MTCA Regulations

~ ELUL ~ Leave a comment

Gus Winkes*

For the first time in nearly 20 years, the Department of Ecology (Ecology) is undertaking substantial revisions to the Cleanup Rule, which governs contaminated site cleanups under the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA).[1] This article provides a brief overview of Ecology’s rulemaking process and draft preliminary changes considered to date by the MTCA Stakeholder and Tribal Advisory Group (STAG).[2] Ecology intends to propose rule amendments in the summer of 2021.[3] 

Continue reading “Cleaning Up the Cleanup Rule – Previewing Possible Changes to MTCA Regulations” →